Comments on: inspired to process http://lentic.wordpress.com/2008/10/17/inspired-to-process/ Kjell H Andersen on photography and life Fri, 26 Feb 2010 11:39:33 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Kjell http://lentic.wordpress.com/2008/10/17/inspired-to-process/#comment-1026 Kjell Sat, 21 Mar 2009 18:37:24 +0000 http://lentic.wordpress.com/?p=602#comment-1026 No need to excuse your english here. I'm just a Norwegian doing my best, so I won't notice. I see your point with the mood, but I still like the newer version best. No need to excuse your english here. I’m just a Norwegian doing my best, so I won’t notice.

I see your point with the mood, but I still like the newer version best.

]]> By: bob wong http://lentic.wordpress.com/2008/10/17/inspired-to-process/#comment-1025 bob wong Sat, 21 Mar 2009 17:19:16 +0000 http://lentic.wordpress.com/?p=602#comment-1025 I like the old version because it captures some of the dark mood of reality in the woods that most people seem unaware. Bad english but what the heck, it's real. I like the old version because it captures some of the dark mood of reality in the woods that most people seem unaware. Bad english but what the heck, it’s real.

]]> By: Kjell Harald http://lentic.wordpress.com/2008/10/17/inspired-to-process/#comment-1023 Kjell Harald Wed, 22 Oct 2008 21:57:38 +0000 http://lentic.wordpress.com/?p=602#comment-1023 Thanks Paul and Doug. I started out very dark and moody, even more than any of these images, but it didn't hold up the test of time. The lighter version is more what I wanted to show. The other thing about the light version is that the print responds very well to changing light. In bright light, it looks much like the screen version, but when the light is dimmed, it looks more moody without losing too much detail. Thanks Paul and Doug.
I started out very dark and moody, even more than any of these images, but it didn’t hold up the test of time. The lighter version is more what I wanted to show. The other thing about the light version is that the print responds very well to changing light. In bright light, it looks much like the screen version, but when the light is dimmed, it looks more moody without losing too much detail.

]]> By: Doug Stockdale http://lentic.wordpress.com/2008/10/17/inspired-to-process/#comment-1022 Doug Stockdale Wed, 22 Oct 2008 17:55:59 +0000 http://lentic.wordpress.com/?p=602#comment-1022 Wow, what a nice change, which I think is an overall improvement. The first attempt though does provide a moodier and darker image, one that could stand on its own merits if that was a feeling you were trying to convery. The second is a little more open in the shadows and mid-values and provides more detail there, as the first in comparison seems a little blocked and heavy, almost dull. Wow, what a nice change, which I think is an overall improvement. The first attempt though does provide a moodier and darker image, one that could stand on its own merits if that was a feeling you were trying to convery. The second is a little more open in the shadows and mid-values and provides more detail there, as the first in comparison seems a little blocked and heavy, almost dull.

]]> By: Paul http://lentic.wordpress.com/2008/10/17/inspired-to-process/#comment-1024 Paul Sat, 18 Oct 2008 01:01:39 +0000 http://lentic.wordpress.com/?p=602#comment-1024 Certainly the more processed image is more appealing. Great job! I was just thinking, and this applies to my photography as well, what if the front of the path was just a little darker ... graduating to lighter the further you get along the trail. That way, the eye follows the light down the path. Hmmm, food for thought for some of my pictures! :-) Certainly the more processed image is more appealing. Great job! I was just thinking, and this applies to my photography as well, what if the front of the path was just a little darker … graduating to lighter the further you get along the trail. That way, the eye follows the light down the path. Hmmm, food for thought for some of my pictures! :-)

]]>