I just found a site called Onexposure, and at first glance it seemed quite interesting. It’s a photo sharing site where you upload pictures, but unlike most others, the contributions are screened before they are allowed to get published. I was a bit bored last night, so I signed up and submitted my alotted 3 pictures for review. To my surprise, they were reviewed this morning, and not that surprising, they were all rejected. I’m not really dissapointed since I didn’t plan to submit more pictures. It was just an experiment to see if I would have a chance, and to test the response time of the screening.
Some time ago I decided not to participate on any such sites for a couple of reasons. First of all, the feedback you get is rarely of any value. The people writing comments are mostly there to draw attention to themselves, and the only motivation for writing is to make someone else post a comment to your own photos. Then there is the urge to comply with the accepted style for the site. If you submit to a site like this, you’d be fooling yourself if you say you don’t care about comments. You want appraisal of your peers, and inevitabely you will change your photography style to match.
All said, I think the quality to the photos on Onexposure was higher than usual, which I guess is due to the screening. I will probably spend some time browsing through the pictures, and maybe find some inspiration. Since many of the photos on the site is post processed quite heavy handed, I will probably find some Photoshop inspiration there.
Its been a quiet month now. I’m in a serious dry rut right now, and it is one that I really don’t feel like fighting. I just use to wind down for the big happening that is due any time between now and mid April. I may post some more before that, but I make no promises. Oh, and I got a package from Australia this morning. It’s waiting at the post office, and I’ll pick it up tomorrow. Maybe it’s a print from Robert